<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: #131 Cartesian Tweets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chaospet.com/2009/07/08/131-cartesian-tweets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chaospet.com/2009/07/08/131-cartesian-tweets/</link>
	<description>Now updated every day that it is updated</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 06:03:47 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DiogenesdelaPhyrron</title>
		<link>http://chaospet.com/2009/07/08/131-cartesian-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-18501</link>
		<dc:creator>DiogenesdelaPhyrron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chaospet.com/?p=192#comment-18501</guid>
		<description>I was thinking about turning this into a whole discussion, but I&#039;ll spare the world, and instead state: I no longer know I exist. Until I find proof that &quot;existance&quot; exists, then I cannot prove that I stand inside the pool of existance. But thank you anyways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking about turning this into a whole discussion, but I&#8217;ll spare the world, and instead state: I no longer know I exist. Until I find proof that &#8220;existance&#8221; exists, then I cannot prove that I stand inside the pool of existance. But thank you anyways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chaospet</title>
		<link>http://chaospet.com/2009/07/08/131-cartesian-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-18499</link>
		<dc:creator>chaospet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chaospet.com/?p=192#comment-18499</guid>
		<description>DiogenesdelaPhyrron: It&#039;s true that if you could think without existing then premise 2 would be false, but the converse doesn&#039;t hold; it leaves open the possibility of existing without thinking. In other words, it is only stating that thinking is a sufficient condition for existence, not that it is a necessary one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DiogenesdelaPhyrron: It&#8217;s true that if you could think without existing then premise 2 would be false, but the converse doesn&#8217;t hold; it leaves open the possibility of existing without thinking. In other words, it is only stating that thinking is a sufficient condition for existence, not that it is a necessary one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DiogenesdelaPhyrron</title>
		<link>http://chaospet.com/2009/07/08/131-cartesian-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-18495</link>
		<dc:creator>DiogenesdelaPhyrron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 05:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chaospet.com/?p=192#comment-18495</guid>
		<description>So I have been wondering about The Meditations...
Premise-God is the creature and sustainer of all things, including my existance.
Premise-I think, Therefore I am .
Conclusion: I am God.
*In between thought is that if I did not think, I would not exist, therefore my existance is created and sustained from my action of thought. I realize that negating a truthful statement isn&#039;t always (or usually) another truthful statement, but let&#039;s examine that. If I could think without existing, then Premise two is false. If I can exist without thinking then again Premise two seems to be false. Did I just prove myself my own God, or is there a syllogism in my thought? If there is no syllogism, than which premise must Descartes rethink?*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I have been wondering about The Meditations&#8230;<br />
Premise-God is the creature and sustainer of all things, including my existance.<br />
Premise-I think, Therefore I am .<br />
Conclusion: I am God.<br />
*In between thought is that if I did not think, I would not exist, therefore my existance is created and sustained from my action of thought. I realize that negating a truthful statement isn&#8217;t always (or usually) another truthful statement, but let&#8217;s examine that. If I could think without existing, then Premise two is false. If I can exist without thinking then again Premise two seems to be false. Did I just prove myself my own God, or is there a syllogism in my thought? If there is no syllogism, than which premise must Descartes rethink?*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emil</title>
		<link>http://chaospet.com/2009/07/08/131-cartesian-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-17299</link>
		<dc:creator>Emil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chaospet.com/?p=192#comment-17299</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;re a bit more geeky, then this will be very funny too!
http://bash.org/?top1
http://bash.org/?top2

Ex.
 YOU ALL SUCK DICK
 er.
 hi.
 A common typo.
 the keys are like right next to each other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re a bit more geeky, then this will be very funny too!<br />
<a href="http://bash.org/?top1" rel="nofollow">http://bash.org/?top1</a><br />
<a href="http://bash.org/?top2" rel="nofollow">http://bash.org/?top2</a></p>
<p>Ex.<br />
 YOU ALL SUCK DICK<br />
 er.<br />
 hi.<br />
 A common typo.<br />
 the keys are like right next to each other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canuovea</title>
		<link>http://chaospet.com/2009/07/08/131-cartesian-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-17257</link>
		<dc:creator>Canuovea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 03:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chaospet.com/?p=192#comment-17257</guid>
		<description>That is absolutely hilarious. People say the greatest things sometimes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is absolutely hilarious. People say the greatest things sometimes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
